Technological Singularity and Friendly Artificial Intelligence

• Armstrong S, Sotala K (2012) How We’re Predicting AI—or Failing To. In Beyond AI: Artificial Dreams, edited by Jan Romportl, Pavel Ircing, Eva Zackova, Michal Polak, and Radek Schuster, 52–75. Pilsen: University of West Bohemia
• Barrat J (2013) Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era. Macmillan
• Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press
• Bostrom N, Ćirković MM (eds) (2008) Global Catastrophic Risks. New York: Oxford University Press
• Bostrom N, Yudkowsky E (2014) The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. In: Frankish K, Ramsey W (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 316–334
• Callaghan V, Miller J, Yampolskiy R, Armstrong S (2017) Technological singularity. Springer, Dordrecht
• Chalmers, DJ (2010) The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17 (9–10): 7–65
• Eden AH, Moor JH, Søraker JH, Steinhart E (eds) (2012) Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Berlin: Springer
• Good IJ (1965) Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine. Advances in Computers, edited by Franz L. Alt and Morris Rubinoff, 6: 31–88. New York: Academic Press
• Hutter M (2012) Can intelligence explode? Journal of Consciousness Studies 19(1–2), 143–166
• Kurzweil R (1999) The Age of Spiritual Machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking
• Kurzweil R (2005) The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking Press
• Kurzweil R (2014) The singularity is near. In Ethics and Emerging Technologies, edited by R. L. Sandler, 393–406
• Moravec H (1999) Robot: Mere Machine to Transcendent Mind. New York: Oxford University Press
• Muehlhauser L (2013) Intelligence Explosion FAQ. First published 2011 as Singularity FAQ. Machine Intelligence Research Institute, Berkeley, CA
• Muehlhauser L, Bostrom N (2014) Why we need friendly AI. Think (London, England) 13(36):41–47. doi:10.1017/S1477175613000316
• Müller VC (ed) (2014) Risks of artificial general intelligence (Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, Vol. (26/3) Special issue): Taylor & Francis
• Müller VC (2020) Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/
• Potapov A (2018) Technological Singularity: What Do We Really Know? Information 9(4):1–9
• Sandberg A (2010) An overview of models of technological singularity. Paper presented at the Roadmaps to AGI and the future of AGI workshop, Lugano, Switzerland, Mar. 8th
• Sandberg A, Bostrom, N (2011) Machine Intelligence Survey. Technical Report 2011-1. Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford
• Shanahan M (2015) The Technological Singularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
• Shulman C, Jonsson H, Tarleton, N (2009) Machine Ethics and Superintelligence. In AP-CAP 2009: The Fifth Asia-Pacific Computing and Philosophy Conference, October 1st-2nd, University of Tokyo, Japan, Proceedings, edited by Carson Reynolds and Alvaro Cassinelli, 95–97. AP-CAP 2009
• Turchin A, Denkenberger D (2018) Classification of global catastrophic risks connected with artificial intelligence. AI & Society (2018), 1-17
• Vinge V (1993) The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era. In Vision-21: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace, 11–22. NASA Conference Publication 10129. NASA Lewis Research Center
• Walsh T (2016) The singularity may never be near. In IJCAI-16 workshop on ethics for artificial intelligence
• Yampolskiy RV (2015) Artificial superintelligence: a futuristic approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton
• Yampolskiy RV (2017) The singularity may be near. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.01303
• Yudkowsky E (2001) Creating Friendly AI 1.0: The Analysis and Design of Benevolent Goal Architectures. The Singularity Institute, San Francisco, CA, June 15
• Yudkowsky E (2004) Coherent Extrapolated Volition. The Singularity Institute, San Francisco, CA, May
• Yudkowsky E (2008) Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk. In Global Catastrophic Risks, edited by Nick Bostrom and Milan M. Ćirković, 308–45. New York: Oxford University Press

Robot Rights and Status

• Anderson M, Anderson SL (eds) (2011) Machine Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Basl J (2012) Machines as Moral Patients We Shouldn’t Care About (Yet): The Interests and Welfare of Current Machines. In: Gunkel DJ, Bryson JJ, Torrance S (eds) Proceedings of the AISB/ IACAP World Congress 2012: The Machine Question: AI, Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Birmingham, England
• Bryson J (2010) Robots should be slaves. In Wilks, Y (ed), Close Engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issue (pp. 63–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing
• Bryson J (2018) Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology. doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6
• Calverley DJ (2011) Legal rights for machines. In: Anderson M, Anderson SL (eds) Machine ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 213–227
• Cappuccio ML, Peeters A, McDonald W (2019) Sympathy for Dolores: Moral Consideration for Robots Based on Virtue and Recognition. Philosophy & Technology, Online First 1-23
• Coeckelbergh M (2010) Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations. International Journal of Social Robotics. www.springerlink.com/content/v07382007k22j150/
• Coeckelbergh M (2010) Robot Rights? Towards a Social-Relational Justification of Moral Consideration. Ethics and Information Technology 12(3): 209–221
• Coeckelbergh M (2014) The Moral Standing of Machines: Towards a Relational and Non-Cartesian Moral Hermeneutics. Philosophy & Technology 27(1): 61–77
• Danaher J (2019) Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism. In Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00119-x
• Darling K (2016) Extending Legal Protection to Social Robots: The Effects of Anthropomorphism, Empathy, and Violent Behavior Towards Robotic Objects. In Robot Law, edited by Ryan Calo, A. Michael Froomkin and Ian Kerr, 213-231. Northampton: Edward Elgar
• Gerdes A (2015) The Issue of Moral Consideration in Robot Ethics. ACM SIGCAS Computers & Society 45(3): 274–280
• Gordon J-S (2018) What Do We Owe to Intelligent Robots? AI & Society, 1–15
• Gunkel DJ (2012) The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
• Gunkel DJ (2014) A Vindication of the Rights of Machines. Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 113–132
• Gunkel DJ (2015) The Rights of Machines: Caring for Robotic Care-Givers. In Machine Medical Ethics, edited by S.P. van Rysewyk and M. Pontier. Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London: Springer, 151–66
• Gunkel DJ (2018) Robot Rights. MIT Press, Cambridge
• Gunkel DJ (2018) The Other Question: Can and Should Robots Have Rights. Ethics and Information Technology 20(2):  87–99
• Gunkel DJ, Bryson J (2014) The machine as moral agent and patient. Philos Technol 27(1):5–142
• Hernández-Orallo J (2017) The measure of all minds: evaluating natural and artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Levy D (2009) The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(3): 209–216
• Miller LF (2015) Granting Automata Human Rights: Challenge to a Basis of Full-Rights Privilege.  Human Rights Review 16(4): 369–391
• Neely EL (2014) Machines and the moral community. Philosophy & Technology, 27(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1334 7-013-0114-y
• Nyholm S (2020) Humans and Robots: Ethics, Agency, and Anthropomorphism. Rowman & Littlefield International, London
• Rodogno R (2016) Robots and the Limits of Morality. In Social Robots. Boundaries, Potential, Challenges, edited by Marco Norskov. Routledge
• Schwitzgebel E, Garza M (2015) A defense of the rights of artificial intelligences. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 39(1):89–119
• Tavani H (2018) Can social robots qualify for moral consideration? Reframing the question about robot rights. Information, 9(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9040073
• Torrance S (2008) Ethics and Consciousness in Artificial Agents. AI & SOCIETY 22 (4): 495–521
• Torrance S (2014) Artificial Consciousness and Artificial Ethics: Between Realism and Social Relationism. Philosophy and Technology 27(1): 9-29